Re: [PATCH 0/4] notmuch reply bugfix & reply to sender only

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] notmuch reply bugfix & reply to sender only

Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:33:42 -0800

To: Jani Nikula, notmuch@notmuchmail.org, david@tethera.net

Cc:

From: Jameson Graef Rollins


On Thu,  5 Jan 2012 22:25:11 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
> Bikeshedding topic #1: How about making replying to just the sender the default
> in "notmuch reply", and having --reply-all option (instead of --no-reply-all)?
> 
> Bikeshedding topic #2: How about binding 'r' to reply to just the sender by
> default, and making 'R' reply-all (instead of vice versa)?

I personally like both of these suggestions, and would not be bothered
by the changed default, so I support both of these changes.

Maybe we could just use '--all', instead of '--reply-all'?  The 'reply'
part seems kind of redundant with the command:

notmuch reply --all

vs.

notmuch reply --reply-all

jamie.
part-000.sig (application/pgp-signature)

Thread: