Re: [PATCH 00/17] nmbug-status: Python-3-compabitility and general refactoring

Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] nmbug-status: Python-3-compabitility and general refactoring

Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 10:14:01 -0800

To: Tomi Ollila


From: W. Trevor King

On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 12:54:56AM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05 2014, "W. Trevor King" wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 05:00:45PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> >> #DFF for the light-blue works better for me.
> >
> > I'm fine with that.  As I said in my cover letter, I'm happy to have
> > alternative color schemes suggested.  Does anyone else want to chime
> > in on better defaults?  This should probably also be configurable via
> > status-config.json.  Maybe:
> >
> >    { "style": {"html": {"thread-colors": ["#DFF", "#FEF"]}}}
> Maybe we can persuade David to test-run new notmuch-status in
> his production server before it is pushed to notmuch master, and
> bikeshed the style in

I'll remove this once the series lands, but I've currently got a
preview up at

> probably no-one is interested to configure those later (if we even
> get bikeshed comments... ;)

I suppose we can revisit this when someone with an existing color
scheme decides to use nmbug and nmbug-status as their bugtracker (red
a gray for Red Hat?  Blue and yellow for Python? ;).  Until then, I'm
fine with hardcoding this.


This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (
For more information, see
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature)