(And one for the list...) On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:09:35 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 > > This is not what I suggested. I do not like the approach when a single > function is used to both declare a subtest and test for result (as > opposed to test_begin_subtest). The fact that it is possible to write > tests in two different ways makes it hard to maintain and improve the > test framework (one example would be known broken test support). I > consider the proper way to write tests to be using the > test_begin_subtest function. Other functions are not currently > deprecated, but I am against adding new code that make the situation > worse. Sigh. Okay. > Also, please consider documenting new functions in README. Missed that, sorry.