"W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> writes: > > Rather than patching this in Emacs, maybe we should collapse the “not > set” and “set to empty string” cases in notmuch-show.c? I can't think > of any reasons why someone would want to distinguish those two cases, > and it's easier all around if we standardize the representation as far > upstream as possible. > Do the RFCs have anything to say about headers with empty content? If not I'd be inclined to leave the CLI output as raw as possible, just because people are always finding new ways to apply tools. d