On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 10:44:39PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > having notmuch patch email as expected test output feels a bit > confusing to me -- especially as 'git grep' may catch some of the > (possibly future-outdated) content... There were two very similar patches with filename attachments in the corpus, so I used them for the tests ;). I can convert that test to use emacs_fcc_message or some other auto-generated content if you'd prefer. Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy