On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:51:29 -0400, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote: > Yes. We could just deal with that (there aren't *that* many API > consumers). For binary compatibility, I suppose we could even use > symbol versioning. I noticed a similar remark in lib/Makefile.local. But I'm not sure how this work if the interface of a given library function changed. Can someone point me to some more explanation? Of course we can always bump the soname of libnotmuch. It isn't that big of a deal IMHO. d