On 12/23/2011 10:45 PM, Austin Clements wrote: > Quoth Dmitry Kurochkin on Dec 10 at 3:25 am: >> + /* For some reason the GMimeSignatureValidity returned >> + * here is not a const (inconsistent with that >> + * returned by >> + * g_mime_multipart_encrypted_get_signature_validity, >> + * and therefore needs to be properly disposed of. >> + * Hopefully the API will become more consistent. */ >> >> Ouch. In gmime 2.6 this API has changed, but looks like the >> issue is still there. Is there a bug for it? If yes, we should >> add a reference to the comment. Otherwise, we should file the >> bug and then add a reference to the comment :) > > It looks like they're both non-const in 2.6 (which makes more sense to > me). I updated the comment to mention this. Here's the bug report where this was discussed with upstream, fwiw: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=640911 --dkg