On Thu, Oct 06 2016, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:

> <silly vocab nitpicking>
>
> On Sun 2016-09-25 03:32:08 -0400, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> 2) then, minor commit message related comment: if there is going to be v3,
>> in id:20160924200735.25425-2-adi@adirat.com adi mentioned 'next patches'
>> -- those are not patches (anymore) when commits are made, so it would be
>> better to reword that sentence. If anythine else doesn't come up, simplest
>> thing is to change the word to 'commits'. As said, this is minor thing,
>> and we have worse things in commit messages; if there is no need to send
>> v3, or the message change is forgotten then it may go in as it is now...
>
> Before these things are accepted into whatever you consider the
> canonical git repo to be, while they're still patches floating around in
> our various mailboxes, they aren't really "commits" either.  I'd use
> "changesets" as the generic term.

That's even betten reason to reword the message so none of the words are
used >;)


>
> </silly vocab nitpicking>
>
>         --dkg
> _______________________________________________
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch