Re: MIME restructuring [was: Re: release-candidate/0.6]

Subject: Re: MIME restructuring [was: Re: release-candidate/0.6]

Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:49 -0700

To: Carl Worth, Daniel Kahn Gillmor

Cc: Notmuch Mail

From: Jameson Graef Rollins

On Mon, 16 May 2011 14:20:07 -0700, Carl Worth <> wrote:
> I'll have to learn better how to control the emacs mail composer in
> order to understand how to get signatures to cover attachments if I want
> to do that kind of thing.

See mml-secure-message-sign-pgpmime to sign an entire message, as
opposed to just a single part.

> This seems to be justifying my fears about the code duplication---the
> two code paths are already divergent, (which means that things like
> notmuch part-number identifiers cannot be used between the different
> formats). I'd like to fix that by preventing the code duplication.
> Also, both paths seem to be suffering from some excess part-number
> incrementing somewhere.

I think the two paths reconverge later in the series.  Can you look
ahead a bit to see if that concern is addressed?

part-000.sig (application/pgp-signature)