David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes: > Ignoring this return value seems like a bad idea in general, and in > particular it has been hiding one or more bugs related to handling > long directory names. > --- > > This is not a fix for the aforementioned bugs, but it at least makes > clear part of the problem. The XDDIRENTRYnnnnn: terms are not checked > for length in the same way as XDIRECTORY terms. It isn't clear the > same hashing strategy will work, as the XDDIRECTORY terms are used to > create lists of child directories. It may be the best we can do is > enforce a limit on the length of path elements in trees indexed by > notmuch. Applied to master. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org