Re: Protected headers in notmuch

Subject: Re: Protected headers in notmuch

Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2018 09:44:20 -0400

To: David Bremner, Jameson Graef Rollins, Notmuch Mail


From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor

On Sat 2018-06-02 16:20:25 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Jameson Graef Rollins <> writes:
>> I've pushed a branch of this series rebased against notmuch/release (for
>> some reason master is currently a couple commits behind) and fixed to
>> reflect the exposure of notmuch_message_get_database:
>> All tests pass.  Note it requires gmime 3.0 (which tripped me up for a
>> bit since notmuch still implicitly supports older gmime versions).
> Depending on how much work that is to fix, it might be time to actually
> rip out the pre-3.0 support; we deprecated it 7 months ago.

as far as i'm concerned, i don't mind losing gmime support for versions
before 3.0.  for debian, we have 3.0 in stretch-backports, so anyone who
wants a backported notmuch can just build-depend on it directly.

are there other platforms where a current notmuch might be backported to
that don't have gmime 3.0 ?

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature)
notmuch mailing list