Quoting Daniel Kahn Gillmor (2017-11-17 10:03:09) > On Wed 2017-11-15 23:29:54 +0100, Ruben Pollan wrote: > > Message.get_property (prop) returns a string with the value of the property. > > Upon review, this is actually insufficient for making robust use of the > session-key series :( > > In particular, it only returns the first value for the session key > returned. See the last patch. I added the implementation of get_properties (and I use it in my session-key branch of alot). Hopefully this solves the problem. > In the session-key series, i work around this by simply trying each > session key against an encrypted part until i find one that works. It > would be "cleaner" (more principled) to somehow associate each session > key with the part(s) of the message file(s) that it is capable of > decrypting, but that's a lot of bookkeeping -- i think it's actually > "cleaner" (less code, less computation in the standard case) to just > take the current approach. Fair enough for me, I'm copying this approach in alot as well. -- meskio | http://meskio.net/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- My contact info: http://meskio.net/crypto.txt -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Nos vamos a Croatan.
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list email@example.com https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch