On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:03:15 -0400, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote: > On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote: > > For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to > > have in place: > > > > * Changes to indexing, (addition of body:, folder:, list:, etc.). This > > is stuff that I'll work on. > > Also, fwiw, the folder: indexing is probably the new feature that I'm > most eagerly awaiting. I've got all these ideas for ways to handle sent > mail and drafts if we can get this working. Maybe I am missing some context here - what exactly does 'indexing' mean here? > Presumably others must be annoyed about having to manually "read" and > archive all their sent mail, unless there's some other way that people > having been dealing with this that I'm not aware of. my import/tagging script deals with +sent on emails that I've sent and removes -inbox -unread on them. The FCC logic gets them filed into a Sent folder (right now just one - see previous comment about making this >From address dependent) > And as for drafts, they could be easily indexed and managed by the UI if > the folder: search term is available. Hmm - haven't even thought about drafts, yet. How would the UI deal with those? /D -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center