On Wednesday, 2019-04-10 at 15:27:14 +02, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> writes: > >> Yes. My argument was not that we shouldn't have this, just that I wonder >> if it results in a good workflow for people who are not using >> notmuch/mu4e/gmail (or any other client that shares the same kind of >> thread view). > > With about 1 year of experience using mu4e-conversation, I found that it > works really well, actually better in most cases since it does not > "pollute" emails with forgotten citations. Encouraging people to trim their replies is an ongoing burden, I agree. > Most people use Gmail or clients that support threading, in which case > this is really a good fit. 90% of my email is via my employer. There is no Gmail there, and most people are not using a threaded mailer. In general they are used to inter-mingling their comments in replies rather than top-posting or not quoting (but this is definitely changing over time, with top-posting becoming more common). > But really if we think about the workflow of "most people", then most of > the time citations are ignored (e.g. top-posting) and just pollute the > rest of the emails. In those cases (the majority?) a non-threaded > workflow does not really work I think. I've no problem with their being more options. dme. -- Stranded starfish have no place to hide. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch