On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:30:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <email@example.com> wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner <email@example.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > > > Changes: > > > > > > > > v4: > > > > > > > > * rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for another review > > > > > > > > > > I pushed this series. > > > > > > Maybe this was discussed already, but I think ideally * would apply only > > > to open messages. So consider that a feature request if someone is > > > looking for a project. > > > > > > > How about if '*' applies to all messages (as it currently does), > > but 'C-u *' only to open messages? That would make more sense IMHO. > > > > But, conforming to your original request, I've implemented the inverse. > > > > I personally do like '*' as is and do not want to change it's behavior. > Though I am not against adding a prefix argument for it. > Same here. In v2 , '*' tags all and 'C-u *' tags only open. One can always swap the keybindings if so inclined. > Regards, > Dmitry > > > Patches follow. > > > > > > > d > > > _______________________________________________ > > > notmuch mailing list > > > email@example.com > > > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch > > > > > > Peace > > > > -- > > Pieter > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > firstname.lastname@example.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch Peace -- Pieter  id:"email@example.com"