David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes: > Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes: > > >> I don't think this reasoning is sensible. If the entire thread is >> deleted, and a new message comes in, it should *not* get the same mesage >> ID. ghosts should only exist in the database when other messages point >> to them. >> >> So i'd be fine with killing this entire last test, unless someone can >> propose a good reason to keep it. > > I think I buy your reasoning, but I'd be happy if Austin (who introduced > ghost messages, and wrote that test, could comment. I have pushed the series, amended to remove that one test from T530. d