Re: [PATCH 1/2] test: add check for <expected> filename argument for test_expect_equal_file

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] test: add check for <expected> filename argument for test_expect_equal_file

Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:24:53 -0800

To: Dmitry Kurochkin, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: Jameson Graef Rollins


On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:04:05 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, we can do both: check file name for consistent diff order
> (from expected to actual) and use file names that the caller provides.
> 
> What do you think?

I'm not sure it's worth it, but I suppose that's fine.

jamie.
part-000.sig (application/pgp-signature)

Thread: