On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:12:52 +1300, martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> wrote: > also sprach Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> [2010.01.27.0603 +1300]: > > > This is getting involved. > > > > > > Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these complex and > > > context-sensitive decisions be delegated to sub-processes? ala git hooks? > > > > I think this idea is completely independent of anything having to do > > with using git as a mail store. That's why I was trying to separate it > > into a separate thread. > > I think he meant "notmuch hooks like you have hooks for Git too", > e.g. thread:755741d13573c7642761d2a175cb146d Are you trying to use thread: such that it could be passed to notmuch show to see the conversation? That's not going to work so well if so. Thanks, James