Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

Subject: Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:39:10 +1300

To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: martin f krafft

also sprach Servilio Afre Puentes <servilio@gmail.com> [2010.01.29.0132 +1300]:
> >> [tags]
> >> inbox = +inbox,+unread
> >> sent = +sent
> >> drafts = +draft
> >> archive = -inbox
> >
> > This proposal, on the other hand, is an interesting one, but when is
> > it supposed to happen? It just feels wrong to make this happen as
> > part of 'notmuch new'.
> 
> Why so?

I guess I just dislike having to run notmuch new regularly, rather
than integrating the database more closely with the mail flow.

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
"to get back my youth i would do anything in the world, except take
 exercise, get up early, or be respectable."
                                                        -- oscar wilde
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail)

Thread:

• martin f krafft—[notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
  • Scott Robinson—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, unread]
    • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
    • martin f krafft—[notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags) [inbox, signed, unread]
      • Jameson Rollins—Re: [notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags) [inbox, signed, unread]
        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags) [inbox, signed, unread]
      • Asheesh Laroia—Re: [notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags) [inbox, unread]
        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags) [inbox, signed, unread]
          • Asheesh Laroia—Re: [notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags) [inbox, unread]
            • martin f krafft—[notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, signed, unread]
              • Asheesh Laroia—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, unread]
                • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, signed, unread]
              • Sebastian Spaeth—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, unread]
                • Mike Kelly—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, unread]
                  • Jameson Rollins—[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                    • Scott Robinson—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                      • Jameson Rollins—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                          • James Westby—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                            • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                              • James Westby—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                              • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                    • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                      • Servilio Afre Puentes—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                          • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                            • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                              • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                            • Jed Brown—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, signed, unread]
                • Sebastian Spaeth—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, unread]
              • Stewart Smith—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, unread]
  • Scott Morrison—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, unread]
    • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
      • Scott Morrison—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, unread]
        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
        • Carl Worth—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
  • David A. Harding—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, unread]
  • Carl Worth—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
    • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
      • Carl Worth—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]