Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

Subject: Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:34:21 +1300

To: James Westby

Cc: notmuch

From: martin f krafft

also sprach James Westby <jw+debian@jameswestby.net> [2010.01.28.1828 +1300]:
> Are you trying to use thread: such that it could be passed to
> notmuch show to see the conversation?
> 
> That's not going to work so well if so.

Why not? Works fine for me with the vim plugin...

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
"perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but
 when there is nothing left to take away."
                                         -- antoine de saint-exupéry
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail)

Thread:

• martin f krafft—[notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
  • Scott Robinson—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, unread]
    • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
    • martin f krafft—[notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags) [inbox, signed, unread]
      • Jameson Rollins—Re: [notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags) [inbox, signed, unread]
        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags) [inbox, signed, unread]
      • Asheesh Laroia—Re: [notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags) [inbox, unread]
        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags) [inbox, signed, unread]
          • Asheesh Laroia—Re: [notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags) [inbox, unread]
            • martin f krafft—[notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, signed, unread]
              • Asheesh Laroia—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, unread]
                • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, signed, unread]
              • Sebastian Spaeth—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, unread]
                • Mike Kelly—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, unread]
                  • Jameson Rollins—[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                    • Scott Robinson—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                      • Jameson Rollins—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                          • James Westby—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                            • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                              • James Westby—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                              • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                    • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                      • Servilio Afre Puentes—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                          • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                            • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, signed, unread]
                              • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                            • Jed Brown—Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store] [inbox, unread]
                • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, signed, unread]
                • Sebastian Spaeth—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, unread]
              • Stewart Smith—Re: [notmuch] Git as notmuch object store (was: Potential problem using Git for mail) [inbox, unread]
  • Scott Morrison—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, unread]
    • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
      • Scott Morrison—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, unread]
        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
        • Carl Worth—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
  • David A. Harding—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, unread]
  • Carl Worth—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
    • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
      • Carl Worth—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]
        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Idea for storing tags [inbox, signed, unread]