Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> writes:


> Hi
>
> Would it be worth putting the run-hook after the (insert chosen) rather
> than before? That would mean that the hook had access to the full new
> header. It would also mean that it wouldn't matter if the hook changed
> the buffer -- as it is I think the replace might go wrong as we replace
> beg to end and those seem to be integer-points not markers

agreed.

>
> One final query -- this function will be called when completing any of
> To: Cc: Bcc: From: and some other less common headers. We could pass an
> argument which says which header we are on but that is probably more
> complexity than necessary. However, it is probably worth documenting
> that it may be called from these headers in the defcustom for the hook.
>

Just changing the doc sounds sensible to me. Adding extra arguments
sounds complicated since we are also calling the hook from within
the nothmuch-company backend.

d