On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 19:21:18 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi (sorry Peter I had assumed git send-email would have cc'd you on my >> rebase earlier today) >> >> There was some discussion about this patch series on irc and the general >> view was favourable but that, for consistency, all omitted parts should >> received a content-length (including text/html). This is a little messy >> to code into the if else stuff: Jani suggested putting >> content-length/content-encoding into a small function. >> >> Anyway I had hope it was just a trivial rebase and could go in, but the >> above will take a bit longer to do neatly so I will leave it for now. > > Ok. To save any potential duplicated work: I've updated the patch here, > save for test/sexp. Waiting for that to be pushed before updating it. Sorry I am confused: isn't test/sexp already in master? Best wishes Mark