Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:

> On Sat, Feb 12 2022, Michael J. Gruber wrote:
>
> Only thing that came into mind are directory timestamps... if directory
> (m)time is same as before notmuch will not scan it for files...
>
> ... following that if the granularity of directory timestamp were 1 second,
> then it could easily happen than first one new message is not seen, and
> next time there is one extra message to be see...

What do you think about adding --full-scan to the notmuch-new invocation
in add_message? It doesn't make any tests fail and is about the same
speed. I need to do a few more trials, but first time through it was
actually faster (!), maybe because the cache is hot
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org