David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes: > Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes: > >> On Sat, Feb 12 2022, Michael J. Gruber wrote: >> >> Only thing that came into mind are directory timestamps... if directory >> (m)time is same as before notmuch will not scan it for files... >> >> ... following that if the granularity of directory timestamp were 1 second, >> then it could easily happen than first one new message is not seen, and >> next time there is one extra message to be see... > > What do you think about adding --full-scan to the notmuch-new invocation > in add_message? It doesn't make any tests fail and is about the same > speed. I need to do a few more trials, but first time through it was > actually faster (!), maybe because the cache is hot OK, I did 10 repetitions, and for the sequential version of the test suit it is about 2% slower in elapsed time. I would expect it to have more impact on slower disks (this SSD), but still not too bad of a slowdown. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org