Re: [PATCH] doc/python: correct wording around container complexity.

Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc/python: correct wording around container complexity.

Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 21:04:55 +0100

To: David Bremner, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc: jwilk@debian.org

From: Floris Bruynooghe


On Sat 22 Feb 2025 at 13:42 -0400, David Bremner wrote:

> Based on a suggestion from Jakub Wilk.
> ---
>  bindings/python-cffi/notmuch2/__init__.py | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bindings/python-cffi/notmuch2/__init__.py b/bindings/python-cffi/notmuch2/__init__.py
> index f281edc1..b1cd21c1 100644
> --- a/bindings/python-cffi/notmuch2/__init__.py
> +++ b/bindings/python-cffi/notmuch2/__init__.py
> @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ In these python bindings they have sometimes been exposed as
>  like :class:`collections.abc.Set` or :class:`collections.abc.Mapping`
>  etc.  This gives a more natural API to work with, e.g. being able to
>  treat tags as sets.  However it does mean that the
> -:meth:`__contains__`, :meth:`__len__` and frieds methods on these are
> -usually more and essentially O(n) rather than O(1) as you might
> -usually expect from Python containers.
> +:meth:`__contains__`, :meth:`__len__` and similar methods on these are
> +usually more expensive and essentially O(n) rather than O(1) as you might
> +expect from Python containers.
>  """
>  
>  from notmuch2 import _capi


LGTM
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org

Thread: