* Floris Bruynooghe <flub@devork.be>, 2025-02-24 21:04:
>On Sat 22 Feb 2025 at 13:42 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>
>> Based on a suggestion from Jakub Wilk.
>> ---
>>  bindings/python-cffi/notmuch2/__init__.py | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/bindings/python-cffi/notmuch2/__init__.py b/bindings/python-cffi/notmuch2/__init__.py
>> index f281edc1..b1cd21c1 100644
>> --- a/bindings/python-cffi/notmuch2/__init__.py
>> +++ b/bindings/python-cffi/notmuch2/__init__.py
>> @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ In these python bindings they have sometimes been exposed as
>>  like :class:`collections.abc.Set` or :class:`collections.abc.Mapping`
>>  etc.  This gives a more natural API to work with, e.g. being able to
>>  treat tags as sets.  However it does mean that the
>> -:meth:`__contains__`, :meth:`__len__` and frieds methods on these are
>> -usually more and essentially O(n) rather than O(1) as you might
>> -usually expect from Python containers.
>> +:meth:`__contains__`, :meth:`__len__` and similar methods on these are
>> +usually more expensive and essentially O(n) rather than O(1) as you might
>> +expect from Python containers.
>>  """
>>
>>  from notmuch2 import _capi
>
>
>LGTM

Looks good to me, too.

-- 
Jakub Wilk
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org