On Sun, Jan 16 2022, Tomi Ollila wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 14 2022, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote:

>> on second thought, i think we could perhaps just go for the simpler
>> "%t", which would allow inserting the type anywhere, even in the middle
>> of a word... i think a problem here is that "word" or "symbol" (which is
>> what my suggestion used) constituent depend on the definition of what's
>> a word or symbol in the active mode.
>>
>> although that would prevent fancy things like "%type: %t", but that's a
>> bit of a corner case, don't you think?
>
> Yes, simpler; the cases where is breaks are (probably?) seldom enough.

agreed then.  v5 of the patch should be doing just that, if i didn't
mess up.

thanks,
jao
-- 
The enjoyment of one's tools is an essential ingredient of successful
work. – Donald E. Knuth
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org