On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 06:28:55AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: > W. Trevor King writes: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:36:10PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: > >> W. Trevor King writes: > >> > If we don't have an upstream, there is nothing to merge, so > >> > nothing is unmerged. This avoids errors like: > >> > >> pushed this one patch. > > > > Without the stderr-catching of something like patch 3, this means > > folks without an upstream are going to see a distracting: > > > > error: No upstream configured for branch 'master' > > > > if they run 'nmbug status' without an @upstream. > > > > I'm working through the Python translation now ;). > > Perhaps the best thing is to revert that patch then? Sure. Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy