On Sat, Mar 12 2016, David Bremner wrote:
> Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:
>
>> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: reply --format=sexp --format-version=1 --reply-to=sender thread:0000000000004a6f
>> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=raw --part=2 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk
>> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=sexp --include-html --part=3 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk
>> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=raw --part=3 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk
>>
>
> I think the problem is in the following let form, which uses
> notmuch-show-process-crypto. That isn't set in search mode. I'm unclear
> on what the right solution is here; we could check
> notmuch-crypto-process-mime, but I'm not sure how this would interact
> with the handling of prefix arguments (for temporary toggling).

Is "reply" from search mode a common pattern of use? Currently it seems
generally un-useful (the thread has to contain just a single message -
not just a single matching message).

> (defun notmuch-mua-reply (query-string &optional sender reply-all)
>   (let ((args '("reply" "--format=sexp" "--format-version=1"))
> 	(process-crypto notmuch-show-process-crypto)
> 	reply
> 	original)