Re: (emacs) Parsing problems replying to encrypted html

Subject: Re: (emacs) Parsing problems replying to encrypted html

Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:20:01 +0100

To: David Edmondson, David Bremner, Tomi Ollila

Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org

From: Matthew Lear


On Sat, Mar 12 2016 at  2:37:44 pm GMT, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12 2016, David Bremner wrote:
>> Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:
>>
>>> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: reply --format=sexp --format-version=1 --reply-to=sender thread:0000000000004a6f
>>> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=raw --part=2 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk
>>> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=sexp --include-html --part=3 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk
>>> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=raw --part=3 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk
>>>
>>
>> I think the problem is in the following let form, which uses
>> notmuch-show-process-crypto. That isn't set in search mode. I'm unclear
>> on what the right solution is here; we could check
>> notmuch-crypto-process-mime, but I'm not sure how this would interact
>> with the handling of prefix arguments (for temporary toggling).
>
> Is "reply" from search mode a common pattern of use? Currently it seems
> generally un-useful (the thread has to contain just a single message -
> not just a single matching message).
>
>> (defun notmuch-mua-reply (query-string &optional sender reply-all)
>>   (let ((args '("reply" "--format=sexp" "--format-version=1"))
>> 	(process-crypto notmuch-show-process-crypto)
>> 	reply
>> 	original)

Hi. I just wondered if anyone had managed to make any progress on this?

Thread: