On Sat, Mar 12 2016 at 2:37:44 pm GMT, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12 2016, David Bremner wrote: >> Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes: >> >>> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: reply --format=sexp --format-version=1 --reply-to=sender thread:0000000000004a6f >>> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=raw --part=2 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk >>> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=sexp --include-html --part=3 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk >>> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=raw --part=3 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk >>> >> >> I think the problem is in the following let form, which uses >> notmuch-show-process-crypto. That isn't set in search mode. I'm unclear >> on what the right solution is here; we could check >> notmuch-crypto-process-mime, but I'm not sure how this would interact >> with the handling of prefix arguments (for temporary toggling). > > Is "reply" from search mode a common pattern of use? Currently it seems > generally un-useful (the thread has to contain just a single message - > not just a single matching message). > >> (defun notmuch-mua-reply (query-string &optional sender reply-all) >> (let ((args '("reply" "--format=sexp" "--format-version=1")) >> (process-crypto notmuch-show-process-crypto) >> reply >> original) Hi. I just wondered if anyone had managed to make any progress on this?