Interesting, 'R' in emacs gives empty content. I might have Austin's reply change in this version -- although I suspect the problem is not there. Everyone using emacs MUA with latest notmuch(1)es experiment pressing 'R' while reading the mail I'm replying to Pasting content... > [ multipart/mixed ] > [ message/rfc822 ] > From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> > Subject: Bug#628018: [PATCH] notmuch-mutt utility for notmuch/contrib/ > To: 628018@bugs.debian.org > Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:36:06 +0200 > > [ multipart/signed ] > [ Good signature by key: 0x4900707DDC5C07F2DECB02839C31503C6D866396 ] > [ multipart/mixed ] > [ text/plain ] > Here is an updated patch set that ships the notmuch-mutt utility and > updated the Debian packaging for it. It is now better integrated with > notmuch: it has been renamed to "notmuch-mutt" (to match the naming > convention of other notmuch interfaces) and stores all its data under > ~/.cache/notmuch/mutt/ to avoid polluting user $HOME with other > directories. I've also fixed the Debian packaging to generate the > manpage during build. I think storing stuff to .../.cache/... is Great !!! However, if we're "allowing" public software to use .../.cache/notmuch directory we should have policy to do so. I suggest we add a description file to notmuch source distribution which describes the public software that are allowed to contain files in notmuch XDG directories. The file could have format which describes the file/directory name, the software using it and some description why this file is there. Another thing is this .cache hardcoding. Should this be resolved first by using $XDG_CACHE_HOME, (then *MAYBE* $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/.cache) and finally $HOME/.cache Tomi > > The first patch in the set adds notmuch-mutt to contrib/, the second > updates debian/ to build a new "notmuch-mutt" binary package. > > The full story is available at http://bugs.debian.org/628018 > > David: I'm still unable to get through the moderation queue of the > notmuch mailing list. Would you be so kind to forward this mail there, > for patch review? > > TIA, > Cheers.