Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:

>
> I'm a little weirded out by the move to a static notmuch_database_t
> *notmuch object.  Are we doing this because we don't want to pass
> around the database to internal functions?

Yes

> I know that the scope of nomtuch-show.c is basically "global scope",
> but i worry that it makes the code more difficult to read and
> maintain.
>

I agree it's not so nice with globals in general.

>
> Is it that much worse to pass around the notmuch_database_t *?
>

It has a lot of code impact, it really propagates to a lot of
places. For instance it also impacts the json and text api, because
those need to have the same signatures as the json api. Also the
database needs to be opened in places where it's currently not opened,
such as in notmuch_search_command().

I have started on such a patch and can certainly complete that if this
is the direction we want to move. I can warn you that there is a lot of
code changes (although they are cosmetic).


/Johan
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch