On Thu 2019-11-21 22:56:04 +0100, Johan Parin wrote:
> Here is a taste (not fully tested, but seems to work).

Oof, i see what you mean :(

I haven't tried to implement this a different way, so i don't know
whether there isn't a shorter cut to what we want, but yow it is a lot.

Are we doing something more deeply, architecturally wrong that saddles
us these two rather displeasing choices?

> diff --git a/doc/man1/notmuch-config.rst b/doc/man1/notmuch-config.rst
> index 28487079..0eb59883 100644
> --- a/doc/man1/notmuch-config.rst
> +++ b/doc/man1/notmuch-config.rst
> @@ -204,6 +204,12 @@ The available configuration items are described below.
>      supported. See **notmuch-search-terms(7)** for a list of existing
>      prefixes, and an explanation of probabilistic prefixes.
>  
> +**show.extra_headers**
> +    A list of extra headers that will be output by **notmuch show**
> +    with ``--format=sexp``, if present in the message.
> +
> +    Default: empty list.
> +
>  **built_with.<name>**
>      Compile time feature <name>. Current possibilities include
>      "compact" (see **notmuch-compact(1)**) and "field_processor" (see

Given the implementation choices, i think you want **[STORED IN
DATABASE]** here (see the definitions for query.<name> and
index.header.<prefix> and index.decrypt).

Thanks for taking the time to sort this out!

       --dkg