On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:36:07 +0200, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:07:40 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:33:58 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I did not follow the rest of the discussion, so sorry if I missed
> > > something obvious.  But why can't we render HTML parts in replies the
> > > same way we do in notmuch-show (using `mm-display-part')?  That should
> > > not introduce a w3m.el requirement, would use the same renderer as
> > > configured for show and hence would produce consistent output in show
> > > and reply.
> > 
> > Agreed, that would be good. It could be done as a second stage, though.
> 
> For the record. I built emacs 23.3 from source and after installation
> by default there is no w3m module available.

Currently it's broken for everyone. With the proposed changes it will be
fixed for some people. Further improvements will, of course, be
possible.