Re: [RFC][PATCH] notmuch: Workaround to allow ignoring non-void function return.

Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] notmuch: Workaround to allow ignoring non-void function return.

Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:21:13 +0000

To: Austin Clements

Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org

From: David Edmondson


On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:03:45 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> I must admit I haven't been following the warnings problem very
> closely, but perhaps we shouldn't be ignoring these return codes?

In general I agree, but what would we do if writing an error message to
stderr fails?

dme.
-- 
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
part-000.sig (application/pgp-signature)

Thread: