Re: [RFC][PATCH] notmuch: Workaround to allow ignoring non-void function return.

Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] notmuch: Workaround to allow ignoring non-void function return.

Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:24:41 +0000

To: Dmitry Kurochkin, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: David Edmondson

On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:32:15 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps I am missing something here.  But I do not get any warnings when
> building with GCC 4.6.2 with -Wall -Werror (-O2 and -O0).  I do not like
> adding any complex hacks to make the build warning-free on old GCC
> versions.  If this happens on the build bot, we should just update it or
> ignore the warnings.

I don't see the warnings on my Debian testing system either.

It would be good to understand what is running on the buildbot.

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [PATCH] Properly handle short writes in sigint handlers

Thread:

• David Edmondson—[RFC][PATCH] notmuch: Workaround to allow ignoring non-void function return. [inbox, notmuch::wip, unread]
  • Austin Clements—Re: [RFC][PATCH] notmuch: Workaround to allow ignoring non-void function return. [inbox, unread]
    • David Edmondson—Re: [RFC][PATCH] notmuch: Workaround to allow ignoring non-void function return. [inbox, signed, unread]
      • Austin Clements—Re: [RFC][PATCH] notmuch: Workaround to allow ignoring non-void function return. [inbox, unread]
        • David Edmondson—Re: [RFC][PATCH] notmuch: Workaround to allow ignoring non-void function return. [inbox, signed, unread]
          • David Edmondson—Re: [RFC][PATCH] notmuch: Workaround to allow ignoring non-void function return. [inbox, signed, unread]
          • Austin Clements—Re: [RFC][PATCH] notmuch: Workaround to allow ignoring non-void function return. [inbox, unread]
            • Austin Clements—[PATCH] Properly handle short writes in sigint handlers [inbox, notmuch::obsolete, notmuch::patch, unread]
              • David Edmondson—Re: [PATCH] Properly handle short writes in sigint handlers [inbox, signed, unread]
                • Tomi Ollila—Re: [PATCH] Properly handle short writes in sigint handlers [inbox, unread]
                  • Austin Clements—Re: [PATCH] Properly handle short writes in sigint handlers [inbox, unread]
                • Austin Clements—Re: [PATCH] Properly handle short writes in sigint handlers [inbox, unread]
              • Dmitry Kurochkin—Re: [PATCH] Properly handle short writes in sigint handlers [inbox, unread]
                • David Bremner—Re: [PATCH] Properly handle short writes in sigint handlers [inbox, unread]
                  • Tomi Ollila—Re: [PATCH] Properly handle short writes in sigint handlers [inbox, unread]
  • Dmitry Kurochkin—Re: [RFC][PATCH] notmuch: Workaround to allow ignoring non-void function return. [inbox, unread]
    • David Edmondson—Re: [RFC][PATCH] notmuch: Workaround to allow ignoring non-void function return. [inbox, signed, unread]