Am Do., 31. Aug. 2023 um 17:17 Uhr schrieb David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca>: > > Michael J Gruber <michaeljgruber+grubix+git@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > I still get those issues. OTOH, skipping T460.14 did not show any > > adverse side effects. So I'll do that for emacs29. > > I might be nice to mark some tests ignored rather than skipped so that > > we notice when they do not fail sporadically any more. That is, *if* > > we look at the output of a passing test suite ... > > > > It is possible to selectively mark tests as broken, but it requires > patching the test suite, and it sets a failing exit code if those tests > start passing. Yes, that's why I wrote "ignore". Something like NOTMUCH_IGNORE_TESTS which runs the test, outputs the diff on fail, but "succeeds" without counting towards pass/fail, and reports the number of ignored pass/fail separately - basically "known_broken" without the "known/expectation". I just don't know whether it's worth it. Other folks disable a whole test suite when they want to get a package update going ... Michael _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org