Michael J Gruber <michaeljgruber+grubix+git@gmail.com> writes:

>
> Yes, that's why I wrote "ignore". Something like NOTMUCH_IGNORE_TESTS
> which runs the test, outputs the diff on fail, but "succeeds" without
> counting towards pass/fail, and reports the number of ignored
> pass/fail separately - basically "known_broken" without the
> "known/expectation".
>
> I just don't know whether it's worth it. Other folks disable a whole
> test suite when they want to get a package update going ...

I guess it would be mainly interesting for distro packagers, or I guess
people who wanted to run come kind of CI.

Without looking at the code, I think just ignoring the return value
would be relatively easy, while keeping track of ignored tests might be
a bit more work. Maybe Tomi has a clearer idea / finds this a fun
problem.

d
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org