It's too bad this requires lots of special-casing. I dug into mutt, hoping to find some simpler way to choose what to reply to, but all I found was a far more complicated collection of heuristics (see mutt_body_handler if you're interested). Should reply *ever* include a "Non-text part" message? It certainly doesn't help the receiver of the reply and presumably the sender will either notice that a part is missing if they care about it, or probably miss the Non-text part message anyway if they don't. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote: > This is a small set of tweaks to remove unneccessary "Non-text part:" > lines in reply, for parts that really don't need to be mentioned. > > This patch set is not really related to the series that it is being > sent in reply to, but it has been worked on top of the message/rfc822 > rework of the multipart test, so it's being sent in reply to that > message. > > jamie. > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch >