Re: [PATCH] test: overhaul multipart test to test for improved message/rfc822 handling

Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: overhaul multipart test to test for improved message/rfc822 handling

Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:08:17 -0300

To: Jameson Graef Rollins, Notmuch Mail

Cc:

From: David Bremner

On Mon,  5 Sep 2011 12:01:46 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> The main goal of this overhaul is to define how message/rfc822 parts
> should be handled.  message/rfc822 parts should be output in a similar
> fashion to the outer message, including some subset of the rfc822
> headers.  The following decisions about formatting of message/rfc822
> parts were made:

I have pushed the remaining 3 patches in the series. Namely this one,
and the last 2 from the previous series. I added a brief note to the
commit message about the one test which fails.  I think on the whole the
approach Jamie took of writing the test as the specification is the
correct one. 

d

• Previous message (by thread): Re: tweaks for handling parts in reply

Thread:

• Jameson Graef Rollins—problems with message/rfc822 parts [inbox, notmuch::pushed, signed, unread]
  • Jameson Graef Rollins—improving message/rfc822 part handling [inbox, notmuch::pushed, unread]
    • Jameson Graef Rollins—[PATCH 1/5] test: some small fixes to multipart test [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
      • Jameson Graef Rollins—[PATCH 2/5] test: Fix date in test message in multipart test. [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
        • Jameson Graef Rollins—[PATCH 3/5] test: overhaul multipart test to test for improved message/rfc822 handling [inbox, notmuch::pushed, unread]
          • Jameson Graef Rollins—[PATCH 4/5] Improve handling of message/rfc822 parts by adding a new header_message_part function to the formating structure. [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
            • Jameson Graef Rollins—[PATCH 5/5] emacs: Improve support for message/rfc822 parts. [inbox, notmuch::pushed, unread]
          • Jameson Graef Rollins—tweaks for handling parts in reply [inbox, notmuch::pushed, unread]
            • Jameson Graef Rollins—[PATCH 1/4] test/multipart: test for absence of "Non-text part:" lines in reply for multipart/* and message/rfc822 parts [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
              • Jameson Graef Rollins—[PATCH 2/4] Fix notmuch-reply to not output "Non-text part:" lines for non-leafnode parts. [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
                • Jameson Graef Rollins—[PATCH 3/4] test: test for absence of "Non-text part: application/pgp-*" lines in reply [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
                  • Jameson Graef Rollins—[PATCH 4/4] Ignore "application/pgp-*" parts in reply. [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
            • Austin Clements—Re: tweaks for handling parts in reply [inbox, unread]
            • David Bremner—Re: tweaks for handling parts in reply [inbox, unread]
              • Jameson Graef Rollins—Re: tweaks for handling parts in reply [inbox, notmuch::pushed, unread]
          • Jameson Graef Rollins—[PATCH] test: overhaul multipart test to test for improved message/rfc822 handling [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
            • David Bremner—Re: [PATCH] test: overhaul multipart test to test for improved message/rfc822 handling [inbox, notmuch::pushed, unread]
        • David Bremner—Re: [PATCH 2/5] test: Fix date in test message in multipart test. [inbox, unread]
    • Jameson Graef Rollins—Re: improving message/rfc822 part handling [inbox, signed, unread]
    • Jameson Graef Rollins—Re: improving message/rfc822 part handling [inbox, signed, unread]