Re: [PATCH 7/9] vim: use mailx for sending

Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] vim: use mailx for sending

Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:28:07 +0300

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
> Possilby used by more systems, and besides the code wasn't really
> working properly anyway.

Hmm, I just noticed that mailx in Fedora 13 (apparently heirloom
mailx) is dropping the 'in-reply-to' and 'references' headers, so it
would make more sense to generate output directly for the MTA. FTR.
There's no 'mail' command on F13.

-- 
Felipe Contreras

Previous message (by thread): Re: [PATCH 0/9] vim improvements

Thread:

Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 0/9] vim improvements [inbox, unread]
- Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 1/9] thread: really clean authors [inbox, unread]
- Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 2/9] vim: add archive support from 'show' [inbox, unread]
- Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 3/9] vim: cleanup search buffer [inbox, unread]
- Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 4/9] vim: cleanup search syntax [inbox, unread]
- Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 5/9] vim: remove add_remove_tags_on_screen() [inbox, unread]
- Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 6/9] vim: add option to mark as read + archive [inbox, unread]
- Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 7/9] vim: use mailx for sending [inbox, unread]
  - Felipe Contreras—Re: [PATCH 7/9] vim: use mailx for sending [inbox, unread]
- Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 8/9] vim: run(): optimize non-debug path [inbox, unread]
- Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 9/9] vim: include own improved git-diff syntax [inbox, unread]
- Carl Worth—Re: [PATCH 0/9] vim improvements [inbox, signed, unread]
  - Carl Worth—Re: [PATCH 0/9] vim improvements [inbox, signed, unread]