Re: [PATCH 0/9] vim improvements

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] vim improvements

Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:04:51 -0800

To: Felipe Contreras, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc: Bart Trojanowski

From: Carl Worth

On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 09:57:16 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> So I'll merge these now.

These are all merged and pushed out now. (I pushed only the vim-specific
changes and not the lower-level change to the author cleanup.)

-Carl

-- 
carl.d.worth@intel.com

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [PATCH 0/9] vim improvements

Thread:

• Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 0/9] vim improvements [inbox, unread]
  • Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 1/9] thread: really clean authors [inbox, unread]
  • Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 2/9] vim: add archive support from 'show' [inbox, unread]
  • Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 3/9] vim: cleanup search buffer [inbox, unread]
  • Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 4/9] vim: cleanup search syntax [inbox, unread]
  • Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 5/9] vim: remove add_remove_tags_on_screen() [inbox, unread]
  • Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 6/9] vim: add option to mark as read + archive [inbox, unread]
  • Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 7/9] vim: use mailx for sending [inbox, unread]
    • Felipe Contreras—Re: [PATCH 7/9] vim: use mailx for sending [inbox, unread]
  • Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 8/9] vim: run(): optimize non-debug path [inbox, unread]
  • Felipe Contreras—[PATCH 9/9] vim: include own improved git-diff syntax [inbox, unread]
  • Carl Worth—Re: [PATCH 0/9] vim improvements [inbox, signed, unread]
    • Carl Worth—Re: [PATCH 0/9] vim improvements [inbox, signed, unread]