On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 22:20:25 +0200, Ali Polatel <polatel@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 08:49:10PM +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > >Rebased to current master. > > > >Previous version: > > id:"1307016220-17509-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org" > > > >Discussion: > > id:"1317660447-27520-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net" > > > > Thanks for the nice work! > I want to share one thing which came up to my mind during reading > through them. Since we require bash for tests, we might go for using > bash's builtin 'type -P foo' instead of 'which foo'. Not that it's > important, just wondered "why not?" > > -alip Good suggestion! In fact, we might as well immediately go for full POSIX compliance. How do you feel about using `hash' ? Besides being available in POSIX sh, it has the added benefit of making subsequent lookups faster [*]. Peace -- Pieter [*] This statement only applies to the shell built-in. Other types of hash may distort your perception of time, which is likely to result in significantly slower lookups.