David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes: > Is it correct that the statically linked version (notmuch) worked OK but > the dynamically linked version (notmuch-shared) failed? That's > consistent with what I observe on Debian, it's just that here the > dynamically linked version falls back on the canonicalize_file_name in > glibc, hiding the error. Actually I'm wrong about this part. or at least I don't know how to test this on a glibc based system. My suggested test with nm is bogus, since all symbols from libnotmuch.so will show up the same way. d