Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem

Subject: Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem

Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 13:00:38 -0300

To: Thomas Klausner, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: David Bremner

Thomas Klausner <tk@giga.or.at> writes:

> Hi!
>
> I'm currently starting to try out notmuch-0.16 on NetBSD. It went off
> to a rocky start, since it segfaulted in the initial config setup.
>
> Debugging it I found that notmuch uses a glibc extension to realpath,
> allowing NULL as second argument.

This exact bug was fixed long ago, tagging fixed in nmbug.

• Previous message (by thread): Re: notmuch-0.18 issues [was Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem]

Thread:

• Thomas Klausner—notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [attachment, inbox, notmuch::bug, notmuch::fixed, unread]
  • Jani Nikula—Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [inbox, unread]
    • Jani Nikula—Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [inbox, unread]
      • Thomas Klausner—Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [inbox, unread]
        • Tomi Ollila—Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [inbox, unread]
          • Thomas Klausner—Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [inbox, unread]
    • Thomas Klausner—Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [inbox, unread]
  • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [inbox, unread]
    • Thomas Klausner—Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [inbox, unread]
      • Jani Nikula—Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [inbox, unread]
  • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [inbox, unread]
    • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [inbox, unread]
      • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [inbox, unread]
      • Thomas Klausner—notmuch-0.18 issues [was Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem] [attachment, inbox, unread]
        • Tomi Ollila—Re: notmuch-0.18 issues [was Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem] [inbox, unread]
        • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-0.18 issues [was Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem] [inbox, unread]
        • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-0.18 issues [was Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem] [inbox, unread]
          • Tomi Ollila—Re: notmuch-0.18 issues [was Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem] [inbox, unread]
            • Thomas Klausner—Re: notmuch-0.18 issues [was Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem] [inbox, unread]
  • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem [inbox, unread]