On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:19:54 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote: > I did verify the above in a copy of WG14/N1124. For anyone that doesn't > recognize that, that's the draft from the C99 working group that I've > been told is remarkably similar to C99 but distinct in that it's freely > available[*]. I haven't verified the similarity, but I have found that > document quite useful in cases like this one. This one is more recent (TC3): http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf I don't know the legality of this copy: http://www.ishiboo.com/~danny/c++/C_STANDARD-ISOIEC9899-1999.pdf Jed