Re: [PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:11:49 +0100

To: Tomi Ollila

Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org

From: David Bremner


Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:

> I'd presume anyone else using such an old system will have bigger
> problems getting their notmuch compiled (recent enough zlib being one
> of those), so this makes me wonder whether there is actually anyone
> needing rst2man there (besides me, of course :)

I guess the original reasoning was that rst2man was part of
python/docutils and so more likely to already be available.  

d

Thread: