Re: [PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man

Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 10:35:10 -0800

To: Tomi Ollila

Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org

From: W. Trevor King


On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 07:12:13PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> … so this makes me wonder whether there is actually anyone needing
> rst2man there…

Requiring Sphinx >= 1.0 (2010-07-23 [1]) to build man pages is fine
with me.

Cheers,
Trevor

[1]: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Sphinx/1.0

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature)

Thread: