Re: [PATCH] test: optionally print subtest number

Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: optionally print subtest number

Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:25:14 -0800

To: David Bremner, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: Jameson Graef Rollins


On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:18:16 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
> We don't actually have test names, at least not ones directly suitable
> for file names.  I guess we could encode them or something, is that what
> you mean?

Don't we?  There is at least a word/phrase that's consistent between the
actual test script names, what is listed in the TESTS variable (below),
and what is output when the tests are run (ie. "basic:" or
"search-folder-coherence:").  Are those not test names?

jamie.


TESTS="
  basic
  help-test
  new
  count
  search
  search-output
  search-by-folder
  search-position-overlap-bug
  search-insufficient-from-quoting
  search-limiting
  tagging
  json
  multipart
  thread-naming
  raw
  reply
  dump-restore
  uuencode
  thread-order
  author-order
  from-guessing
  long-id
  encoding
  emacs
  emacs-large-search-buffer
  maildir-sync
  crypto
  symbol-hiding
  search-folder-coherence
  atomicity
  python
  hooks
  argument-parsing
"
part-000.sig (application/pgp-signature)

Thread: