On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:18:16 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:22:21 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote: > > > I've only been vaguely following this "test count" stuff, but I'm not > > sure I understand what's the point of giving tests a number that is > > ultimately mutable. Why not just label things by the test name, instead > > of the count? That wouldn't require keeping track of number/name > > mapping, which will change over time. > > We don't actually have test names, at least not ones directly suitable > for file names. I guess we could encode them or something, is that what > you mean? > BTW I have some plans to introduce optional explicit test ids that can be used for inter-test dependencies. E.g.: test_begin_subtest test-id-1 "A subtest" .... ;; in another test requre that test-id-1 passed test_require_subtest test-id-1 Regards, Dmitry > d > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch